DPR discusses human creative contribution, platform duties and royalties in the copyright bill.
- Record date
- 7 Oct 2026
- Last verified
- 2026-10-12
- Next review
- 2026-10-19
DPR report published 7 October about discussion on 6 October.
What happened
A DPR report says the copyright amendment bill being discussed with the government includes criteria for AI-assisted works, proposed platform responsibilities and changes to royalty management. The report describes proposals, not an enacted law.
ALUN's view
ALUN's view: musicians should watch how the bill defines human contribution, documents the creative process and handles payments. None of those proposed provisions changes today's rights by itself.
What is still unclear
The DPR report describes the bill and a legislator's position; it is not the final statutory text. The wording, adoption and effective date may change. No AI-training royalty is established by this report.
What it may mean for you
- Musicians and cultural workers: Keep records of what you wrote, performed, selected and revised, while treating new criteria as proposals.
- Policy makers: Check the bill text and legislative status before describing any platform or royalty duty as law.
Where did this come from?
- Bob Hasan: RUU Hak Cipta Berikan Pelindungan Adil di Era Digital
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia · Official statement
Source date: 2026-10-07
Source location: DPR report of Baleg discussion, paragraphs on platform duties, collective management and AI-assisted works.
Related source records
