For policy makers and ministries
See what has been confirmed, who can act and which questions are still open.
In collaboration with PIKAT
Alun and PIKAT are working together on AI and music policy. The work connects musicians’ experiences with research on AI rules and responsibilities.
This describes how we plan to work, not completed research or policy results. The collaboration covers AI and music policy only. It does not mean either organisation endorses all of the other’s work.
PIKAT is developing a policy brief examining AI and music in Indonesia, using existing research, rules and the experiences of musicians and cultural workers.
Regional context
These examples show different approaches, not a ranking or shared rules. Saudi Arabia is an international example, not part of Southeast Asia. This is ALUN's view, not PIKAT's position.
Indonesia / records and roles
SE Menkominfo No. 9/2023 establishes a national soft-law ethics baseline for AI business actors and electronic-system providers.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
What the source does not confirm: The circular is not a music-specific regulation and does not resolve detailed copyright questions.
Public reporting on recommendations from Konferensi Musik Indonesia / Indonesian Music Conference includes the need for guidance or policy on AI use in music, including copyright, royalties and ethics.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Culture; Konferensi Musik Indonesia / Indonesian Music Conference
What the source does not confirm: Public reporting establishes recommendations, not an adopted AI framework or implementation mandate.
Government institutions discuss the draft national AI roadmap and AI ethics instruments in a formal policy process.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
What the source does not confirm: Discussion of a draft does not establish enactment or sector-specific requirements.
The national AI roadmap and ethics instruments enter a reported harmonization stage.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
What the source does not confirm: A harmonization record is a process milestone, not final law.
The ministry reports that discussion of the two draft presidential instruments concluded before submission to the President.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs
What the source does not confirm: Later public statements still described the instruments as awaiting enactment or being prepared.
Public reporting and statements by Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital Republik Indonesia / Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia address training data, creator economics and proposed AI-related provisions in the copyright amendment process.
Institution responsible: Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs; Ministry of Law
What the source does not confirm: The detailed provisions remain draft and must not be described as enacted law.
Cultural advancement and national cultural policy
Convened Konferensi Musik Indonesia / Indonesian Music Conference 2025
No music-specific ministry AI position is inferred.
National digital and AI policy process
Leads national AI roadmap and ethics work
No adopted music-sector guidance is publicly established.
Copyright policy and rights administration
Leads the copyright amendment process
Draft provisions are not enacted law.
Creative-economy policy and industry development
Publicly coordinating on AI and creative-economy policy
Sector input does not replace copyright or digital-policy authority.
No regulatory authority
Produced public recommendations in 2025
Recommendations are not regulation or proof of implementation.